<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>domestic law &#8211; Kapok Tree Diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/tag/domestic-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress</link>
	<description>Exploring the conduct of international relations and the ideals of democracy &#38; individual liberty in the context of the Christian worldview.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44605809</site>	<item>
		<title>International Law’s Expansion into Individual Affairs: A Tug of  War over Tradition, Jurisdiction and Universal Human Rights</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/international-laws-expansion-into-individual-affairs-a-tug-of-war-over-tradition-jurisdiction-and-universal-human-rights/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/international-laws-expansion-into-individual-affairs-a-tug-of-war-over-tradition-jurisdiction-and-universal-human-rights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intl Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolf Eichmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convention Against Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes against humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customary norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female genital mutilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICCPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICESCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inalienable rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Covenant on Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderate degree of pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social and Cultural Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticking time bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Introduction &#8211; (C) Kapok Tree Diplomacy, July 2010, All rights reserved. Jeff Dwiggins, author. FREE CONTENT As international law extends beyond traditional state-to-state interactions into matters directly involving the rights]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/international-laws-expansion-into-individual-affairs-a-tug-of-war-over-tradition-jurisdiction-and-universal-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Efficacy of the Modern Institution of International Law</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-efficacy-of-the-modern-institution-of-international-law/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-efficacy-of-the-modern-institution-of-international-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intl Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Law Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conceptual changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition of international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divine rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Grotius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bolton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jus cogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal obligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimacy of international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri v. Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinio juris sive necessitatis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peremptory norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow Warrior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid v. Covert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-executing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement of international disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources and evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terra nullius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[territorial issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaty reservations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[International law has evolved into a growing and complex body of rules and norms that states consent to based upon their concrete interests in a peaceful, prosperous and stable society. While international law differs and often competes substantively from municipal law, international law plays a predominantly positive role in allowing nations to benefit from the binding obligations derived from its sources. 

This essay will cover a brief history and definition of international law in Section One to include its sources and evidences followed by a comparison of international law with municipal law in Section Two with an emphasis on treaties.  The paper will conclude with some observations on how well the framework of international law actually works. 

The views and opinions expressed in this paper are completely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of the Navy (DON) or any of the Armed Forces.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-efficacy-of-the-modern-institution-of-international-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
