<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reciprocity &#8211; Kapok Tree Diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/tag/reciprocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress</link>
	<description>Exploring the conduct of international relations and the ideals of democracy &#38; individual liberty in the context of the Christian worldview.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 19:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44605809</site>	<item>
		<title>To what extent is the cultivation of economic growth under Western ‘free market’ principles even possible in the developing world?</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/to-what-extent-is-the-cultivation-of-economic-growth-under-western-free-market-auspices-feasible-in-the-developing-world/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/to-what-extent-is-the-cultivation-of-economic-growth-under-western-free-market-auspices-feasible-in-the-developing-world/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Conflict Reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital account liberalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Republic of the Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developing world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[division of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easterly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic interdependence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equilibrium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market-dominant majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meltdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multilateral institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nondiscrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rational choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state sovereignty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Assuming that the ‘developing world’ includes the entire developing world, not just states undergoing post-conflict reconstruction (PCR), I think we must first define what Western ‘free market’ auspices are, and how might they be cultivated under Western/liberal principles.

Gilpin asserts that “Liberalism may, in fact, be defined as a doctrine and set of principles for organizing and managing a market economy in order to achieve maximum efficiency, economic growth and individual welfare” that is committed to “free markets and minimal state intervention,” “individual equality and liberty,” and the “premise … that the individual consumer, firm, or household is the basis for society” (421-422). Does this type of economy promote the stability a developing state needs?

Liberalism has its own set of empirical economic laws geared towards stability to include: comparative advantage, marginal utility, a quantity theory of money and rational choice that lead a market economy towards a “powerful tendency towards equilibrium and inherent stability” (Gilpin 422-423). ]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/to-what-extent-is-the-cultivation-of-economic-growth-under-western-free-market-auspices-feasible-in-the-developing-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">334</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last Word on Justice: The Impact of the International Criminal Court On the Future of International Justice and its Rocky Road to Legitimacy</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-last-word-on-justice-the-impact-of-the-international-criminal-court-on-the-future-of-international-justice-and-its-rocky-road-to-legitimacy/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-last-word-on-justice-the-impact-of-the-international-criminal-court-on-the-future-of-international-justice-and-its-rocky-road-to-legitimacy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intl Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[act of aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilateral Article 98 agreeements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checks and balances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime of aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David J. Scheffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delayed justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegated jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DROC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erga omnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC Review Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impartiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Center for Transitional Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jus ad bellum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jus cogens norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kampala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws of war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Moreno-Ocampo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonparty states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuremberg Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace vs. justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post hoc justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proprio motu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tadic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[territorial jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Lubanga Dyilo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unwilling or unable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Versailles Treaty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“The world no longer has a choice between force and law. If civilization is to survive, it must choose the rule of law.” Dwight D. Eisenhower (qtd. in Ferencz 288)

Introduction

The remarkable ascent of international criminal law over the past two decades has had, and continues to have, a profound impact on the laws of war, humanitarian and human rights laws, and existing international institutions like the United Nations (UN).  The global community took a giant step towards holding the perpetrators of the most serious international crimes accountable to the rule of law by adopting the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. 

Bringing the violators of these serious crimes to justice, however, has proven to be easier said than done. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has encountered numerous practical and conceptual obstacles in its efforts to become an impartial and effective instrument of justice.  Some commentators like Brett Schafer and Steven Groves believe the ICC is so deeply flawed that it even violates international law in addition to threatening state sovereignty (1). 

The paper seeks to review the history, structure and effectiveness of the ICC, including its recent agreement on a definition for the Crime of Aggression. I will specifically examine practical objections to the ICC, its conceptual challenges, its evolving role in matters of peace and justice, and how it is challenging the traditional role of the UN Security Council (UNSC).   

The ICC’s jurisdictional reach will be examined in detail as well as its procedural safeguards. Finally, I’ll review some ways the United States can effectively cooperate with the ICC as a non-party partner while simultaneously advancing its foreign policy and national security interests and resisting the trend in international law towards pooled sovereignty and global governance. 

The views and opinions expressed in this paper are completely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of the Navy (DON) or any of the Armed Forces.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-last-word-on-justice-the-impact-of-the-international-criminal-court-on-the-future-of-international-justice-and-its-rocky-road-to-legitimacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Extent That Theories of Cooperation Harmonize With Reality in Contemporary International Relations</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Russett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complex interdependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Held]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Peace Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratization of global politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Grieco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regime and Complex Interdependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Jervis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Keohane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural constraints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=74</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[January 30, 2010 &#8211; Jeffrey R. Dwiggins, Copyright, Kapok Tree Diplomacy &#8211; FREE CONTENT The Extent That Theories of Cooperation Harmonize With Reality in Contemporary International Relations International relations theorists]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Applying Domestic-Level Variables in Context to Relative Gains, Reciprocity and Anarchic Concepts to Examine Institutional Cooperation in the Middle East</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance of power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffuse reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic-Level Variables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double security dilemma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Sterling-Folker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Grieco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neorealism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Keohane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeino-Mahmalat]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my initial studies of international relations and world politics through the mainstream theoretic lenses, the idea that “liberal” institutions operating within the anarchic structure of the international system can]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
