<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>regimes &#8211; Kapok Tree Diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/tag/regimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress</link>
	<description>Exploring the conduct of international relations and the ideals of democracy &#38; individual liberty in the context of the Christian worldview.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44605809</site>	<item>
		<title>Do NGOs have a Place in Conflict Resolution?  Are They Really Neutral? Are Military PRTs the Answer?</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/do-ngos-have-a-place-in-conflict-resolution-what-about-neutrality-are-military-prts-the-answer/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/do-ngos-have-a-place-in-conflict-resolution-what-about-neutrality-are-military-prts-the-answer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevent/Contain Intl. Conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil-Military Operations Centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code of conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do no harm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failed states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haliburton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanitarian Information Centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InterAction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iviolability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political legitimacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private military firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provincial Reconstruction Teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRTs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Cross Code of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NGOs are essential to conflict resolution in as much as they possess the necessary skills, knowledge, personnel and experience to help resolve the conflict and the context is favorable to their participation. Certainly, the traditional role of the NGO has changed in nature from one of purely humanitarian relief to one that includes the roles of civil society builder and peace broker. This role transformation challenges the NGO’s assertion of neutrality and inviolability. Pamela Aall lists certain conditions that must exist prior to NGO conflict resolution intervention, saying NGOs must have:

The posts, views and opinions expressed on this site are completely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of the Navy (DON) or any of the Armed Forces.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/do-ngos-have-a-place-in-conflict-resolution-what-about-neutrality-are-military-prts-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">309</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zero Problems &#8211; Enhancing Security and Preventing Conflict in Turkey’s Evolving Partnerships with the European Union, United States, Middle East, Russia and Eurasia</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/zero-problems-enhancing-security-and-preventing-conflict-in-turkeys-evolving-partnerships-with-the-european-union-united-states-middle-east-russia-and-eurasia/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/zero-problems-enhancing-security-and-preventing-conflict-in-turkeys-evolving-partnerships-with-the-european-union-united-states-middle-east-russia-and-eurasia/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevent/Contain Intl. Conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmet Davutoğlu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ankara Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annan Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armenian-Turkish relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azerbaijan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balkans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Stream II pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cagaptay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caucasus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Security and Defense Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterbalancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davutoglu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erdogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU accession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Customs Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission on Enlargement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Defense Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europeanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek Cypriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honest broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice and Development Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurdistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurdistan Workers Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavi Marmara flotilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minsk Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mustafa Kemal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nabucco pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nagorno-Karabakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottoman Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnership for Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaceful coexistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferred partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister Erdogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-Western]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconciliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhythmic diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsun-Ceyhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic security partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkish Cypriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-faced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Economic Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero problems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Turkey’s security partnerships with Europe, NATO and the United States have played an important role in its foreign policy decisions since the 1950’s as a counter to Russia during the Cold War (CountryWatch, “Political History”). Founded on the principles of “secularism, strong nationalism, statism, and to a degree, western orientation” by Mustafa Kemal after the collapse of the 600-year old Ottoman Empire (U.S. State Dept., Background Note), Turkey is uniquely positioned at the crossroads and nexus of “four areas of growing strategic importance in the post-Cold War era” (Larrabee 3): the Balkans and Europe, the Middle East and Persian Gulf region, and the Caucasus/Central Asia region. 
 
With the end of the Cold War and the onset of two Persian Gulf Wars, Turkey’s interests and strategic alliances began to markedly shift their trajectories (Larrabee 6-9). This paper will explore Turkey's recent modifications of its strategic security partnerships from the perspectives of key states within each of its regional spheres of influence in a context of conflict prevention. Section One will review the Balkans and European perspective; in Section Two the Middle East; Eurasia and the Caucasus in Section Three with a special slant on Russia; and in Section Four the United States. Section Five will review Turkey’s internal domestic issues to include the Kurdish challenge, political trends, global aspirations and some interesting comparisons with China. The paper will conclude with Section Six and some recommended conflict prevention strategies to counterbalance Turkey’s various threats. 

The views and opinions expressed in this paper are completely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of the Navy (DON) or any of the Armed Forces. 
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/zero-problems-enhancing-security-and-preventing-conflict-in-turkeys-evolving-partnerships-with-the-european-union-united-states-middle-east-russia-and-eurasia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">290</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Some Aspects of the International Economic System Impede and Some Enable Global Integration</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-some-aspects-of-the-international-economic-system-impede-and-some-enable-global-integration/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-some-aspects-of-the-international-economic-system-impede-and-some-enable-global-integration/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intl. Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilateral trade agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doha Round]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Direct Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Income Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-National Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Free Trade Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wars of globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are many faces of global integration, both positive and negative, and almost as many definitions. Yet, in order to assess how aspects of the international system impede or enable it, we must define it. I characterize global integration as a social, economic, cultural and political “process of increasing interconnectedness” (Smith, Baylis, &#038; Owens 17) expressed  historically and empowered conceptually by a “dense network of international flows of goods, services, capital, information, ideas and people” (Spero &#038; Hart 453).  Regimes, institutions, states, regions and transnational issues have specific effects upon the international economic system. 

The purpose of this paper will be to detail the positive and negative effects of these important system variables. In doing so, I will make the case that global integration is increasing, irreversible in nature, and leading to a higher level of instability requiring enhanced international cooperation best expressed in an increased advisory role for international regimes and institutions as opposed to an increased authoritative and governance role.
 
The views and opinions expressed in this paper are completely my own and do not represent the views or opinions of the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of the Navy (DON) or any of the Armed Forces.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-some-aspects-of-the-international-economic-system-impede-and-some-enable-global-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">182</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Extent That Theories of Cooperation Harmonize With Reality in Contemporary International Relations</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Russett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complex interdependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Held]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Peace Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratization of global politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Grieco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regime and Complex Interdependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Jervis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Keohane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural constraints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=74</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[January 30, 2010 &#8211; Jeffrey R. Dwiggins, Copyright, Kapok Tree Diplomacy &#8211; FREE CONTENT The Extent That Theories of Cooperation Harmonize With Reality in Contemporary International Relations International relations theorists]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/the-extent-that-theories-of-cooperation-harmonize-with-reality-in-contemporary-international-relations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Applying Domestic-Level Variables in Context to Relative Gains, Reciprocity and Anarchic Concepts to Examine Institutional Cooperation in the Middle East</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance of power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffuse reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic-Level Variables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double security dilemma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Sterling-Folker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Grieco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neorealism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Keohane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeino-Mahmalat]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my initial studies of international relations and world politics through the mainstream theoretic lenses, the idea that “liberal” institutions operating within the anarchic structure of the international system can]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/applying-domestic-level-variables-in-context-to-relative-gains-reciprocity-and-anarchic-concepts-to-examine-institutional-cooperation-in-the-middle-east-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
