<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>terrorists &#8211; Kapok Tree Diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/tag/terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress</link>
	<description>Exploring the conduct of international relations and the ideals of democracy &#38; individual liberty in the context of the Christian worldview.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44605809</site>	<item>
		<title>Crafting a National Security Grand Strategy and Navigating Its Effective Integration as a Policy Across the Whole of Government</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/crafting-a-national-security-grand-strategy-and-navigating-its-effective-integration-as-a-policy-across-the-whole-of-government/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/crafting-a-national-security-grand-strategy-and-navigating-its-effective-integration-as-a-policy-across-the-whole-of-government/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Natl. Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil-military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millenium Challenge Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ways]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think a good starting place to assess executive department policy integration begins with the strategy formulation phase for what types of policies the executive is going to endorse and promote. For the purposes of this post, by executive I mean ‘the President of the United States.’ Ultimately the strategic planning system identifies the ends, ways and means of a sound and compelling strategy that “integrates the processes and documents” of the people working under him and the “people and organizations with which he directly coordinates” (Meinhart 2006, 304, 311). As a scholar, I would want to know how the executive came up with the policy, what the goals were, and what the strategy was to advance the policy.

            Yarger adds that the overarching strategy must be proactive and anticipatory, resource-balanced, driven by political purposes, hierarchical, comprehensive and derived from “thorough analysis and knowledge of the strategic situation and environment” (2006, 107-111). ]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/crafting-a-national-security-grand-strategy-and-navigating-its-effective-integration-as-a-policy-across-the-whole-of-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">425</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How well do the thoughts and intentions of the Framers of the Constitution on responsibility for national security still hold up today?</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-well-do-the-thoughts-and-intentions-of-the-framers-of-the-constitution-on-responsibility-for-national-security-still-hold-up-today/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-well-do-the-thoughts-and-intentions-of-the-framers-of-the-constitution-on-responsibility-for-national-security-still-hold-up-today/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice and consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barenblatt v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalist Paper No. 64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search and seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Convention on the Law of the Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unreasonable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Powers Acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Framers for their part did have a lot to say about the delineation of powers in these areas. The Constitution is a good place to start in determining how those powers are enumerated and what limits if any apply to them. 

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution says: 

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (Passed 12/15/1791).

The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution says:

“nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (Passed 7/9/1868) 

These amendments lay out the case for citizens’ right to privacy and limits on government instrusion in this matter without spelling out what constitutes “unreasonable.”]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/how-well-do-the-thoughts-and-intentions-of-the-framers-of-the-constitution-on-responsibility-for-national-security-still-hold-up-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">421</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Samuel P. Huntington’s ‘Clash of Civilizations’ model explain trends in foreign affairs after the 9-11 attack?</title>
		<link>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/can-samuel-p-huntingtons-clash-of-civilizations-model-explain-trends-in-foreign-affairs-after-the-9-11-attack/</link>
					<comments>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/can-samuel-p-huntingtons-clash-of-civilizations-model-explain-trends-in-foreign-affairs-after-the-9-11-attack/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truepath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Conflict Reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al-Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clash of Civilizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemptive strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shiite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/?p=341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The conduct of international relations post 9-11 has certainly been dramatically shaped by the US. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, in the former as a pre-emptive attack to remove WMD and the Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein, and in the latter to hunt down al Qaeda and Taliban terrorists and eliminate the training bases that harbored these non-state actors. In both cases, massive reconstruction projects have been undertaken to prevent Iraq and Afghanistan from becoming failed states and help them adopt political and economic reforms of a Western orientation.

But these U.S. interventions are not the only factor explaining the conduct of IR after 9-11. Paul Diehl notes that the demand for peace operations and subsequent escalation in third party interventions rose dramatically following the Cold War due to “superpower retrenchment in providing aid to other states,” an explosion of failed states and civil wars that spawned out of the power vacuum, an increased advocacy for democracy and free markets, greater international concern for human rights, and globalization (52-55).]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://kapoktreediplomacy.com/hp_wordpress/can-samuel-p-huntingtons-clash-of-civilizations-model-explain-trends-in-foreign-affairs-after-the-9-11-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">341</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
